Skip to main content
aifinhub

Calculator

Sharpe vs Sortino Calculator

Paste daily returns; get Sharpe, Sortino, Calmar, and Omega side-by-side with a recommendation on which ratio fits your distribution.

Inputs
Form inputs / CSV
Runtime
Instant
Privacy
Client-side · no upload
API key
Not required
Methodology
Open →

Education · Not investment advice. BaFin/EU framework. Past performance does not indicate future results. Editorial standards Sponsor disclosure Corrections

Inputs

Risk-free rate (annual)4.0%

Sortino (annualized)

-0.83

μ_ann -12.7% · downside dev 15.2% · 504 obs.

Risk-adjusted return ratios

Sharpe

-0.61

μ / σ

Sortino

-0.83

μ / downside-σ

Calmar

-0.40

μ_ann / max DD

Omega

0.91

upside / downside ratio

Opinion

Use Sortino. Returns are positively skewed or asymmetrically distributed — penalizing total volatility (Sharpe) under-rewards a strategy whose volatility is mostly upside.

Max drawdown: 31.6% · Total volatility: 20.8%

What each ratio measures

  • Sharpe — excess return per unit of total volatility.
  • Sortino — excess return per unit of downside-only volatility.
  • Calmar — annualized return per unit of max drawdown.
  • Omega — gains-vs-losses ratio at the threshold (no normality assumption).

See methodology for formulas + references.

How to use

Step-by-step

Full calculator guide →
  1. 1

    Upload your return series.

  2. 2

    Set target return for Sortino (default 0%; risk-free rate is another common choice).

  3. 3

    Set the period frequency (daily/weekly/monthly) so annualization is correct.

  4. 4

    Read Sharpe and Sortino side-by-side. The ratio between them tells you about return skew.

  5. 5

    Compare against your strategy peer group. Long-only equity Sharpe typically 0.3-0.7; market-neutral 1.0-1.5; HF-style 1.5+.

Glossary references

Terms used by this tool

All glossary →

Questions people ask next

FAQ

When should I use Sharpe vs. Sortino?

Sharpe penalizes both upside and downside volatility — appropriate when you treat all volatility as risk. Sortino penalizes only downside (returns below a target threshold) — appropriate when upside volatility is desirable, like in long-volatility or trend-following strategies. The tool reports both side by side so you can see how they diverge.

What target return should I use for Sortino?

Common choices: 0% (penalize any negative return), risk-free rate (penalize sub-Treasury returns), or a strategy-specific MAR (minimum acceptable return). The tool defaults to 0% and lets you override. The methodology page documents how the choice changes interpretation.

Can Sortino be much higher than Sharpe?

Yes — for strategies with heavy positive skew. A trend-following CTA with most returns clustered near zero and occasional large wins might have Sharpe 0.5 and Sortino 1.2. The 2× ratio is real and informative; it says 'this strategy makes money in lumps, not smoothly'.

How is annualization handled?

Multiply Sharpe (and Sortino) by √(periods per year). For monthly data, ×√12. For daily, ×√252. The tool detects period frequency from input timestamps; you can override. The methodology page warns about the i.i.d. assumption underlying √-time scaling — it overstates ratios for serially correlated returns.

What's a 'good' Sharpe ratio?

Context-dependent: long-only equity Sharpes are 0.3-0.7 over decades; market-neutral hedge funds target 1.0-1.5; high-frequency strategies can sustain 3-5+ but capacity is constrained. Above 5 sustained over 5+ years is institutional-grade. Anything above 8 should make you skeptical of the data, not impressed.

Complementary tools

Planning estimates only — not financial, tax, or investment advice.