Skip to main content
aifinhub
Market Microstructure Calculator Guide

How to use Execution Simulator

Model realistic order fills — square-root market impact, linear temporary impact, latency jitter, partial fills, and queue position. The page reports the actual fill price and slippage you would have paid versus a naive backtest assumption.

By Orbyd Editorial · AI Fin Hub Team
Best Next MovePlaygrounds

Execution Simulator

Model realistic order fills — square-root market impact, linear temporary impact, latency jitter, partial fills, and queue position. See the real cost.

CalculatorOpen ->

On This Page

What It Does

Use the calculator with intent

Model realistic order fills — square-root market impact, linear temporary impact, latency jitter, partial fills, and queue position. The page reports the actual fill price and slippage you would have paid versus a naive backtest assumption.

Backtesters whose strategies look great until they hit live markets and slippage eats the edge — and need to bake that slippage into the backtest assumptions.

Interpreting Results

The realistic-fill price is the headline. Compare against the naive backtest fill. Persistent gap of more than a basis point means slippage will eat the strategy's edge — either downsize, slow down, or rethink the entry/exit.

Input Steps

Field by field

  1. 1

    Upload data

    Upload a sample order log (timestamp, side, size, price target).

  2. 2

    Pick option

    Pick the execution venue from the dropdown — different venues have different priority rules and message protocols.

  3. 3

    Set parameters

    Set queue-position assumptions (default: pessimistic — your order arrives behind 50% of book volume at the price level).

  4. 4

    Run calculation

    Run the simulation. Read realized fills vs. target prices, slippage in basis points, and partial-fill rates.

  5. 5

    Increase

    Increase order size to find the 'capacity ceiling' where slippage exceeds expected alpha. This is your strategy's practical capacity limit.

Common Scenarios

Use realistic starting points

Small order in liquid name

Order size

0.1% ADV

Symbol type

Large-cap equity

Naive vs realistic fill differs by <1bp. Slippage is a rounding error; backtest is honest.

Large order in mid-liquid name

Order size

5% ADV

Symbol type

Mid-cap equity

Realistic fill 10–30bp worse than naive. Slippage dominates the strategy's edge; need to split the order or trade slower.

Try These Tools

Run the numbers next

FAQ

Questions people ask next

The short answers readers usually want after the first pass.

Three things: queue position (where in the limit-order book your order lands), partial fills (when the contra-side liquidity is smaller than your order), and slippage from market impact (your order moves the price). Most backtests assume instant, complete fills at the mid-quote — which dramatically overstates achievable returns.

Related Content

Keep the topic connected

Planning estimates only — not financial, tax, or investment advice.