Is EODHD or FMP cheaper for financial data?

EODHD is the one you can actually budget against: a free tier, EOD all-world at €19.99/month, fundamentals at €59.99/month, and all-in-one at €99.99/month, all published in euros. FMP's 250-requests/day free tier makes evaluation easy, but its exact premium prices are not consistently public, so confirm them on FMP's pricing page before any true comparison.

Which has better fundamentals data, EODHD or FMP?

FMP. It is fundamentals-first by design: financial statements, SEC filings, earnings-call transcripts, and corporate calendars are core, with price data secondary. EODHD sells a fundamentals feed on top of its price coverage, but its primary draw is cheap global history. If your agent reasons over filings, FMP's depth is the stronger fit.

Which is better for global market coverage?

EODHD. Broad, affordable end-of-day coverage across many world exchanges is its core strength, with EOD all-world at €19.99/month. That suits a universe spanning multiple markets where you mainly need history and EOD prices. FMP's coverage is solid but weighted toward fundamentals depth rather than the widest, cheapest global price breadth.

EODHD vs Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) 2026

The short answer

EODHD vs FMP in 2026 is cheap global breadth versus fundamentals-and-filings depth. EODHD publishes clear personal tiers in euros (free, €19.99/mo EOD all-world, €59.99/mo fundamentals, €99.99/mo all-in-one) with strong global coverage. FMP is fundamentals-first (statements, filings, transcripts) with a 250-requests/day free tier, but its exact premium prices are not consistently public. EODHD wins transparency; FMP wins filings depth.

For fundamentals and historical data in 2026, EODHD vs Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) is cheap global breadth versus fundamentals-and-filings depth, and both are budget-friendly. EODHD publishes clean, low personal-use pricing (in euros): a free tier, EOD all-world at €19.99/month, a fundamentals feed at €59.99/month, and an all-in-one plan at €99.99/month, with strong global market coverage. FMP leans fundamentals-first (financial statements, filings, earnings-call transcripts, corporate calendars), with a 250-requests/day free tier; its exact premium plan prices are not consistently documented on accessible public sources, so confirm them directly. EODHD wins transparent pricing and global history; FMP wins fundamentals and filings depth. Model the cost for your universe in the Data-Vendor TCO Calculator.

TL;DR

Dimension	EODHD	Financial Modeling Prep
Posture	global EOD + fundamentals breadth	fundamentals-and-filings depth
Free tier	yes (limited)	250 requests/day
Cheapest paid (personal)	€19.99/mo (EOD all-world)	not consistently public
Fundamentals plan	€59.99/mo feed	core to the product
All-in-one (personal)	€99.99/mo	not consistently public
Pricing transparency	clearly published tiers	varies by source

EODHD personal-use prices verified against its pricing page on 2026-05-26. FMP's tier structure and free-tier limit are documented; its exact premium prices are not consistently shown on accessible public sources, so they are not quoted here.

Two budget data APIs, two emphases

EODHD and FMP both target cost-conscious builders, but they emphasize different things. EODHD is built around broad, affordable coverage: end-of-day prices across world markets, plus a fundamentals feed, sold in clearly priced personal tiers. FMP is built around fundamentals depth: financial statements, SEC filings, earnings-call transcripts, and corporate calendars are the core product, with price data secondary.

So the decision is rarely "which is better" in the abstract. It is which dataset your strategy actually leans on: cheap global history and EOD prices, or deep fundamentals and filings to reason over.

Pricing: EODHD is the transparent one

EODHD's personal-use pricing is plainly published in euros: a free tier to start, EOD all-world at €19.99/month, an extended EOD-plus-intraday plan around €29.99/month, a dedicated fundamentals feed at €59.99/month, and an all-in-one plan at €99.99/month (roughly $22/$33/$65/$108). Commercial-use tiers step up from there. You can budget against EODHD without guessing.

FMP's free tier allows 250 requests/day, an order of magnitude more daily headroom than some budget rivals, which makes it easy to evaluate before paying. But FMP's exact premium plan prices are not consistently shown across accessible public sources, so confirm the current numbers on its official pricing page rather than trusting a third-party figure.

Coverage: global breadth versus fundamentals depth

EODHD's strength is breadth at low cost: end-of-day data across a wide set of global exchanges, useful when your universe spans markets and you mainly need history and EOD prices. Its fundamentals feed adds statement data on top.

FMP's strength is depth on fundamentals and filings: financial statements, SEC filings, earnings-call transcripts, and calendars are first-class, which matters when your agent reasons over company fundamentals rather than just prices. If filings and transcripts are central to your workflow, FMP's coverage depth is the draw; if you mainly need cheap global EOD history, EODHD is the leaner fit.

The decision

Cheap global EOD history across many markets: EODHD. Broad coverage at €19.99/month personal.
Deep fundamentals, filings, and transcripts: FMP. Fundamentals-first by design.
Want fully transparent, budgetable pricing: EODHD. Tiers are clearly published.
Large free-tier headroom to evaluate: FMP. 250 requests/day before paying.
Both prices and fundamentals on a budget: EODHD all-in-one (€99.99/month), or FMP if filings depth dominates.

The split is dataset-driven. Pick EODHD for affordable global price history with transparent pricing, FMP for fundamentals and filings depth, and verify FMP's current premium prices directly.

Model the cost for your universe

Headline plan prices understate true cost once you account for your universe size, update frequency, and which datasets you actually pull. Run those through the Data-Vendor TCO Calculator to compare total cost, and if your workflow centers on filings, model the LLM cost of parsing them in the Token-Cost Optimizer.

Twelve Data vs EODHD vs FMP 2026: adding Twelve Data's real-time streaming.
Financial Modeling Prep vs Alpha Vantage 2026: FMP against another budget API.
EODHD vs Tiingo 2026: EODHD against a clean US-focused alternative.

Connects to

Data-Vendor TCO Calculator: total data cost for your universe.
Token-Cost Optimizer: LLM cost of parsing filings and fundamentals.

Sources

EODHD, "Pricing," eodhd.com/pricing (accessed 2026-05-26).
"EODHD vs Financial Modeling Prep," findmymoat.com (accessed 2026-05-26).
Financial Modeling Prep, "Pricing Plans," site.financialmodelingprep.com (accessed 2026-05-26).

Frequently asked questions

Is EODHD or FMP cheaper for financial data?: EODHD is the one you can actually budget against: a free tier, EOD all-world at €19.99/month, fundamentals at €59.99/month, and all-in-one at €99.99/month, all published in euros. FMP's 250-requests/day free tier makes evaluation easy, but its exact premium prices are not consistently public, so confirm them on FMP's pricing page before any true comparison.
Which has better fundamentals data, EODHD or FMP?: FMP. It is fundamentals-first by design: financial statements, SEC filings, earnings-call transcripts, and corporate calendars are core, with price data secondary. EODHD sells a fundamentals feed on top of its price coverage, but its primary draw is cheap global history. If your agent reasons over filings, FMP's depth is the stronger fit.
Which is better for global market coverage?: EODHD. Broad, affordable end-of-day coverage across many world exchanges is its core strength, with EOD all-world at €19.99/month. That suits a universe spanning multiple markets where you mainly need history and EOD prices. FMP's coverage is solid but weighted toward fundamentals depth rather than the widest, cheapest global price breadth.