Alternatives, in AI in Markets
EODHD Alternatives (2026)
EODHD's appeal is breadth at a low, transparent price: end-of-day data across world exchanges at personal-plan rates most rivals charge more for. Its ceiling is granularity and depth: intraday and real-time feeds sit on higher tiers, fundamentals are a separate paid add-on, and filings or transcript depth falls short of dedicated providers. The alternatives below cover those gaps, compared on coverage, fundamentals depth, and data granularity; pricing was first checked against vendor pages on 2026-05-26; the FMP, Twelve Data and Massive plans were re-checked in October 2026.
5 alternatives. Published May 26, 2026. Updated Oct 19, 2026. By AI Fin Hub Research.
A budget global market-data API with transparent pricing. EODHD covers end-of-day data across a wide set of world exchanges plus a fundamentals feed, sold in clearly priced personal tiers in euros: a free tier, EOD all-world at €19.99/month, an extended EOD-plus-intraday plan around €29.99/month, a fundamentals feed at €59.99/month, and an all-in-one plan at €99.99/month (roughly $22 to $108). Commercial tiers step up from there. Its strength is affordable global breadth and budgetable pricing. Limitations: real-time and intraday are higher tiers, the fundamentals feed is a separate add-on, and its filings and transcripts depth is narrower than a fundamentals-first vendor.
The alternatives
5 options worth a look
A fundamentals-first market-data API. FMP centers on statements, filings, transcripts, and calendars, the switch when your strategy needs deeper fundamentals than EODHD's add-on feed provides.
Pros
- Fundamentals-first: statements, filings, transcripts, and calendars are core
- Generous 250-requests/day free tier for evaluation
- Combines prices with deep fundamentals in one API
Cons
- Less global EOD breadth focus than EODHD
- The free tier's 250 requests a day suits evaluation, not a live universe
Best for: Deep fundamentals, filings, and transcripts beyond EODHD's add-on feed
A clean, cost-effective US-focused market-data API with deep history. Tiingo's free Starter tier includes 30+ years of end-of-day stock data, the switch when your universe is US-only and clean history matters most.
Pros
- 30+ years of clean end-of-day US history, even on the free tier
- Strong data-quality reputation for backtesting
- Cost-effective individual plans
Cons
- More US-focused than EODHD's global breadth
- Free fundamentals limited to about 5 years (15+ on premium)
- Less multi-asset breadth than Twelve Data
Best for: Clean US end-of-day history for backtesting when you do not need global breadth
A multi-asset market-data API priced by throughput, with real-time on paid tiers. It spans stocks, forex, and crypto, the switch when you need real-time or intraday across asset classes rather than EODHD's EOD-first model.
Pros
- Multi-asset coverage (stocks, forex, crypto) with real-time on higher tiers
- Clear throughput tiers, each at three credit levels: free Basic, Grow from $29/month, Pro from $99/month, Ultra from $329/month
- No daily cap on paid tiers, uptime SLA on the top tier
Cons
- You pay for call rate as you scale
- Global EOD breadth is less of a focus than EODHD
- Single-asset depth is good but breadth is the draw
Best for: Multi-asset real-time and intraday across stocks, forex, and crypto
A depth-focused US market-data API. Polygon (rebranded to Massive in late 2025) offers granular intraday and tick-level data on US equities and options, the switch when you need US tick depth EODHD does not emphasize.
Pros
- Granular intraday and tick-level US equities and options data
- Clear Stocks tiers: free Basic, $29 Starter, $79 Developer (delayed), $199 Advanced (real-time SIP)
- Deep history (20+ years on Advanced)
Cons
- US-focused, not the global breadth EODHD provides
- Real-time SIP starts at the $199 Advanced tier
- Separate ladders for options, indices, FX/crypto
Best for: Granular intraday and tick data on US markets
A simple, indicator-friendly market-data API. Its built-in technical indicators are the switch when you want price plus computed indicators in one call rather than computing them on EODHD's raw data.
Pros
- Built-in technical indicators returned directly from the API
- Simple, beginner-friendly endpoints
- Transparent rate-tiered premium pricing
Cons
- Free key hard-capped at 25 requests/day, slow for bulk pulls
- Premium scales by per-minute rate ($49.99-$249.99/month)
- Less global EOD breadth than EODHD
Best for: Built-in technical indicators without computing them yourself
Decision table
See the tradeoffs side by side
| Criterion | EODHD | FMP | Tiingo | Twelve Data | Polygon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coverage | global EOD | US + fundamentals | US-focused EOD | stocks/forex/crypto | US tick depth |
| Cheapest paid | €19.99/mo (EOD all-world) | $29/mo (Starter) | low-cost individual plan | $29/mo (Grow) | $29/mo (Starter, delayed) |
| Fundamentals | add-on (€59.99/mo) | core, deep | US, paid depth | limited | limited |
| Strength | cheap global EOD | fundamentals depth | clean US history | multi-asset real-time | US tick depth |
Verdict
EODHD is already a strong, cheap choice for global end-of-day coverage with transparent pricing, so keep it when you need affordable global breadth and budgetable plans. Switch for the gap. Choose Financial Modeling Prep when fundamentals, filings, and transcripts depth matters more than EODHD's add-on feed. Pick Tiingo for clean US historical data when you do not need global breadth. Reach for Twelve Data when you need multi-asset real-time or intraday, and Polygon (now Massive) for granular US tick-level data. Use Alpha Vantage when built-in indicators save you compute. Fundamentals depth and data granularity decide most of these.
Run the numbers next
- Comparators Market Data API Cost Calculator
Compute annual cost of market data across Databento, Massive (formerly Polygon), Alpaca, Tiingo, FMP, and Alpha Vantage for your exact universe, bar resolution, and real-time needs.
- Calculators Backtest Overfitting Score
Upload a backtest trade log and compute Probability of Backtest Overfitting (PBO), Deflated Sharpe Ratio, and the odds your edge survives live trading.
- Generators Trading System Blueprinter
Pick your data source, LLM, broker, storage, risk engine, and logger. Get a Mermaid architecture diagram and a copyable starter file tree — the full stack before you write code.
Questions people ask next
What is the best EODHD alternative for fundamentals?
Financial Modeling Prep (FMP). EODHD offers a fundamentals feed as a separate €59.99/month personal add-on on top of its cheap global price coverage, but FMP is fundamentals-first by design: financial statements, SEC filings, earnings-call transcripts, and corporate calendars are the core product, with a 250-requests-per-day free tier for evaluation. If your strategy reasons over company fundamentals and filings in depth, FMP's coverage is the stronger fit. FMP's paid plans run $29, $69 and $139 a month.
Which EODHD alternative is best for intraday or real-time data?
Twelve Data for multi-asset real-time on paid tiers, or Polygon (now Massive) for granular US tick data. EODHD is end-of-day-first, with intraday and real-time on higher tiers, so when real-time or intraday is central you switch. Twelve Data includes real-time across stocks, forex, and crypto on its paid throughput tiers (Grow from $29/month). Polygon offers granular intraday and tick-level US equities and options data, with full real-time SIP on its $199 Advanced tier. For multi-asset real-time, Twelve Data; for the deepest US intraday and tick granularity, Polygon.
Why would I leave EODHD if it is so cheap?
Because cheap global EOD coverage is not every workload's binding need. You leave EODHD when a specific gap matters more than price: deeper fundamentals and filings (Financial Modeling Prep), granular intraday or tick-level US data (Polygon, now Massive), multi-asset real-time across forex and crypto (Twelve Data), or built-in technical indicators (Alpha Vantage). EODHD's strength is affordable global end-of-day breadth with transparent pricing, and for that job it is hard to beat. The switch is about a missing data dimension (granularity, fundamentals depth, or real-time) rather than cost, since EODHD is already among the cheapest options.
Sources
- EODHD Pricing , EODHD (accessed 2026-10-18)
- EODHD vs Financial Modeling Prep , Find My Moat (accessed 2026-05-26)
- Tiingo API Pricing , Tiingo (accessed 2026-10-18)