Generator
Trading System Blueprinter
Pick your data source, LLM, broker, storage, risk engine, logger. Get a Mermaid architecture diagram + starter repo scaffold (ZIP). Browser-only. Free.
- Inputs
- Configuration
- Runtime
- Instant
- Privacy
- Client-side · no upload
- API key
- Not required
- Methodology
- Open →
1 · Pick your stack
Data source
Where your bars / quotes / book events come from.
Broker
Who your orders route through.
LLM layer
Research + decision-support model. BYO keys.
Storage
How you persist bars, trades, decisions, dossiers.
Risk engine
What stops you from blowing up.
Logging + observability
How you see what the agent actually did.
Scheduler
How cadence is enforced.
Stack signature
Alpaca → Claude Opus 4.8 → Alpaca
7 / 7 layers chosen · risk: Fractional Kelly sizer (quarter Kelly cap)
Schedule: launchd (macOS-native) · Storage: DuckDB + Parquet · Logging: Heartbeat JSON + Telegram alerts
2 · Architecture (Mermaid)
flowchart LR SCHED["launchd"] -->|tick| DATA["alpaca"] DATA -->|bars / book events| NORM[Normalize + persist] NORM --> STORE["duckdb"] STORE --> RESEARCH["claude-opus-4-8 · price-blind research"] RESEARCH -->|proposal + confidence| RISK["fractional-kelly"] RISK -->|sized order| EXEC["alpaca"] EXEC -->|fills + errors| LOG["heartbeat-json"] LOG --> STORE LOG -.-> ALERT[Telegram / email]
Paste into any Mermaid-compatible renderer (Notion, Obsidian, GitHub, VS Code preview).
3 · Starter repo scaffold
trading-system/
├── README.md # start here
├── .env.example # API keys (never commit real values)
├── scripts/
│ ├── fetch-bars.py # data source → local duckdb
│ ├── research.py # LLM call (price-blind context builder)
│ ├── decide.py # risk sizing + decision logger
│ ├── execute.py # broker call (idempotent)
│ └── heartbeat.py # health probe + alert
├── data/
│ ├── heartbeat.json # last-heartbeat timestamp (watchdog reads)
│ ├── circuit.json # {"paused": false, "reason": ...}
│ └── tickers/ # per-ticker markdown dossiers
├── memory/
│ └── decisions.jsonl # append-only decision log
├── plists/
│ └── com.you.trader-*.plist # launchd-based schedules
├── tests/
│ ├── test_research_no_price_leak.py
│ ├── test_sizing_caps.py
│ └── test_idempotent_orders.py
└── pyproject.tomlMinimal, opinionated layout. Everything non-runtime lives outsidescripts/. Add pyproject / requirements to taste.
Why this shape
- · Schedule → data → research → risk → execute → log enforces the ordering that keeps your LLM out of the price decision loop.
- · Heartbeat + circuit breaker are first-class so you can spot dead pipelines in under one cycle.
- · Append-only decisions.jsonl makes post-mortems possible; any LLM-driven system is unauditable without it.
- · Tests cover the three most dangerous failure modes: price leakage, sizing blow-up, duplicate orders.
See methodology for the principle set this generator encodes.
How to use
Step-by-step
- 1
Pick scope (retail / single-strategy production / multi-strategy fund). The blueprint scales with scope.
- 2
Pick asset class and frequency. Equity / daily looks different from FX / minute looks different from crypto / tick.
- 3
Read the architecture diagram and component spec. Each component lists technology recommendations and known failure modes.
- 4
Download starter templates: docker-compose, Terraform IaC, monitoring dashboards. They're skeletons — production hardening is your responsibility.
- 5
Reference the compliance section. Even retail strategies need basic recordkeeping; institutional needs more.
For agents
Use in an agent
Same math, same result shape as the UI above — as a static ES module. No HTTP request, no auth, no rate limit.
import { compute } from "https://aifinhub.io/engines/trading-system-blueprinter.js"; Contract: /contracts/trading-system-blueprinter.json Full agent guide →
Glossary references
Terms used by this tool
Questions people ask next
FAQ
What does the blueprint output look like?
Architecture diagram + component spec for a research-to-production trading system: data ingestion, signal generation, risk checks, execution, monitoring, and deploy/rollback. Each component has technology recommendations, key configuration options, and known failure modes. The methodology page shows a sample blueprint.
Is this for institutional or retail?
The default templates target small-team / single-strategy production deployment — too elaborate for a paper-trading hobbyist, simpler than a multi-strategy fund. The tool exposes a 'scope' selector so you can scale up or down. Each scope tier has different recommended infrastructure.
What does it recommend for execution infrastructure?
For up-to-medium-frequency strategies, a broker API (IBKR, Alpaca) is fine. For higher frequency, the tool walks through colocation tradeoffs and direct exchange connectivity. The methodology page makes the cost-vs-latency tradeoff explicit — you don't need colocation unless your strategy actually depends on sub-millisecond latency.
Does it cover compliance and audit logging?
Yes — every blueprint includes a compliance section: trade-blotter requirements, FINRA recordkeeping, audit-log retention. For US retail or hedge fund tier, the methodology page documents the regulatory minimum and recommends production-grade structured logging from day one.
Are there template configs I can copy?
Yes — the blueprinter outputs starter docker-compose files, IaC templates (Terraform), and example monitoring dashboards. They're skeletons, not production-ready, but they save 1-2 weeks of bootstrap. Methodology page links to the template repos.
Related deep dive
All articles →Read further
Long-form context behind the tool output.
- Comparison · Benchmark·8 min
Broker APIs for AI Agents 2026: MCP Coverage
Broker APIs for AI agents 2026: Alpaca, IBKR, Tradier ranked on MCP server coverage, order idempotency, and retry safety for autonomous trading.
Read - Methodology · Opinion·11 min
Finance MCP Servers: The Security Baseline
An opinionated rubric for grading 2026 finance MCP servers on scope, auth, idempotency, transport, and schema — plus the failure modes that kill agents.
Read - Tutorial · Runnable·9 min
Heartbeats, Watchdogs, Circuit Breakers for Trading
Silent failure is the worst failure mode. Three patterns prevent it — heartbeat, watchdog, circuit breaker — in under 100 lines of Python on launchd.
Read
Complementary tools
Users of this tool often explore
Finance MCP Directory
Security-graded catalog of finance MCP servers — Alpaca, Polygon, Databento, IBKR, Tradier, Tiingo, NautilusTrader. Scope, auth, idempotency, transport.
Data-Vendor TCO Calculator
Compute annual cost of market data across Databento, Polygon, Alpaca, Tiingo, FMP, and Alpha Vantage for your exact universe, bar resolution, history.
Price-Blind Research Auditor
Paste a research prompt or agent context bundle. The auditor flags price numbers, directional words, and outcome-leaking phrases that cause LLMs.